The phrase "arguments of war" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the reasons, justifications, or debates surrounding the concept of war.
Example: "The arguments of war often revolve around issues of morality, national security, and economic interests."
Alternatives: "justifications for war" or "rationale behind war".
To the Americans or the Chinese, the EU's internal struggles are as incomprehensible and irrelevant as the arguments of warring tribes on the edge of his empire might have been for Napoleon.Although it was tactically smart for Mr Chirac to pick a fight with the British in the wake of his referendum defeat, it was also a strategic mistake.
He has no interest in the once fashionable arguments of Cold War revisionists that the Plan was — in the memorable phrase of Stalin's economic adviser Yevgeny Varga- — "a dagger pointed at Moscow".
Unsurprisingly, Mr Cameron is keen to assure British voters this mission is not merely an outbreak of do-goodery, but also "hard-headed" (a favourite Cameron phrase), rooted in national interests, and limited in scope.The prime minister duly offers a second, buttressing set of arguments for war, couched in national-interest terms.
In essence, every war copies the argument of the war of Troy.
Nor do any of the West's arguments for war against Iran hold water.
His very presence in the White House, they insist, would sweep away the lost trust that is the lingering legacy of Mr. Bush's arguments for war in Iraq.
If it is impossible to tell how much of the administration's arguments for war were vindicated or disproved, or who the tax cuts really helped, then proper public accounting is impossible.Beyond that, members of the administration have occasionally acted in ways that have discouraged public debate directly.
The essence of all the arguments in favor of war with Iraq is that the cold war doctrine of containment, predicated on rational action by the Soviet Union, has limited effect in a world where the threat is shadowy terrorist organizations and their "rogue state" allies like Iraq, who are not susceptible to traditional notions of deterrence.
But Jones used the argument of the war effort to persuade them that such a move would boost production and was therefore in the national interest.
It may be for different reasons, although some of it is 'wartime inconvenience.' " Wolfowitz said that he was astonished by the argument of some war critics that, with no imminent threat from Iraq, the overturning of Saddam was unwarranted — an argument that he believes implicitly accepts Saddam's brutality.
