The phrase "arguments of policy" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing or analyzing different viewpoints or proposals regarding a specific policy issue.
Example: "In the debate over climate change, the arguments of policy often revolve around economic impacts and environmental responsibilities."
Alternatives: "policy arguments" or "policy-related arguments".
According to Maloney, arguments on policy and accusations of corruption reached "a degree of frankness never really heard before" in the Islamic Republic.
Here's what City Room is reading in other papers and blogs: Rejecting the arguments of a policy group, an appellate court ruled that the names of retired police officers and the amounts of their pensions would remain private.
From a theoretic viewpoint one could rightly argue that the requirement is absurd: by asking to include these variables among the arguments of the policy it implicitly affirms that they are state variables (in the two previous examples they describe the weather system or the catchment), but at the same time it does not intend to model them as such.
In sum, the human development argument is also one of the most prominent arguments for policies that aim to universalize and establish preschool as mandatory.
As a candidate whose opposition to the war helped define him, Mr. Rhodes said, "Senator Obama constructed an entire argument of foreign policy, based on Iraq".
The idea that social relations and norms that discourage malfeasance can bring order to economic life provides a powerful counterpoint to the argument of senior policy advisors in England that incentives should be re-designed so as to harness and control self-interested behaviour [ 8, 9].
This confirms the argument in favour of policy continuity, i.e. to invest in ALMPs not only during booms when resources are available but also during crises when the unemployed need that support the most.
Nor did the commission find evidence of widespread innovation across the sector – one of the key arguments for the policy of enhancing autonomy.
Given the copious news leaks and op-ed skirmishes of the past six months, nobody could argue that if people only knew what kind of policy arguments were taking place inside the Administration we wouldn't be heading to war.
But his approach also seems to reflect a lack of interest in the substance of policy arguments, and, even more strangely, a lack of interest in explaining his own positions to voters.
It was a big applause line, an indication that the Democrats, unlike those mudslinging Republicans, were going to keep their campaign arguments in the realm of policy, not personality.
