The phrase "arguments extensively" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the thoroughness or depth of arguments in a particular context, such as an essay or debate.
Example: "In her thesis, she presented her arguments extensively, covering all possible counterpoints."
Alternatives: "arguments in detail" or "arguments thoroughly".
The open-question argument was extensively discussed in the 20th century and met with several objections.
In the last few decades, oscillatory behavior and stability of first-order differential equations with deviating arguments have been extensively studied; see, for example, papers [1 20] and references cited therein.
In the last few decades, the oscillatory behavior and the existence of positive solutions of difference equations with deviating arguments have been extensively studied; see, for example, papers [1 20] and the references cited therein.
(In this, he is persuaded by a form of argument originated by Harry Frankfurt. See Frankfurt 1969 and Fischer 1994, Ch.7 for an important development of the argument. The argument has been debated extensively in recent years. See Widerker and McKenna 2003 for a representative sampling. For very recent work, see Franklin 2009 and Fischer 2010 and the works they cite).
Early versions of the text were presented as summative feedback to the ALG where the text, ideas and arguments were commented on extensively.
While Marinella drew on these works extensively, her argument marks a philosophical advance because it is detailed, systematic, and cogent.
A Stirling council spokeswoman said: "Having carefully considered and discussed extensively all the arguments for and against this proposal, Stirling council's planning and regulation panel has refused the application for a development at Park of Keir".
Finally, throughout the intervention, we quoted extensively from the arguments pilot students generated in support of an incremental theory.
Personally, I think it is a good idea that the authors give their authoritative opinion/preference on this kind of discussions, but the opposite arguments should also be presented extensively.
As applied to the climate system, consider it a plausibility argument: the more rapidly and extensively the system is disturbed, the more we would expect that unexpected behaviors will emerge, and the further from expectations they will be.
