"argumentative strategy" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It refers to the approach or technique used to present and argue a point or claim in a debate or discussion. You can use it in any situation where you are discussing the ways in which someone is making an argument or presenting their ideas. Example: The politician's argumentative strategy was to appeal to emotion rather than facts in order to sway the audience's opinion on the controversial issue.
Their argument for this reading is based on Vasubandhu's argumentative strategy rather than the logical structure of individual proofs.
I am not defending that view here, but I am obviously extending the argumentative strategy.
Academic Skepticism, he insisted, is not a theory about knowledge or the world but rather a kind of argumentative strategy.
Ryan's argumentative strategy is to enumerate examples of it, and then conclude that it underlies much of evolution.
Borrow his enthusiasm for a pithy name and call it Gladwellian Revisionism, the ingenious and addictive argumentative strategy that he has popularised in his books, whereby the counterintuitive idea becomes the new received wisdom.
His argumentative strategy is to consider and refute possible objections to evolutionary biorobotics.
This entry will attempt to provide a broad overview of the central themes of Leibniz's philosophy of physics, as well as an introduction to some of the principal arguments and argumentative strategies he used to defend his positions.
(It is relevant that Protagoras' celebrated work 'Truth', which began with the famous 'Man the Measure' sentence (see below) apparently had the alternative title 'Overthrowing' (sc. Arguments) (Kataballontes).) So Protagoras taught argumentative strategies, but we have comparatively little evidence of what these actually were.
As part of a larger discussion of argumentative strategies, Quintilian turns to the "nature of all arguments," which he defines as "reasoning which lends credence to what is doubtful by means of what is certain" (ratio per ea quae certa sunt fidem dubiis adferens: quae natura est omnium argumentorum, V.10.8).
The book describes argumentative strategies used by Chinese legal scholars to legitimize and subvert China's state-sanctioned ideology.
The results of the analysis have been exploited to design a Master's course module focusing on the interpretation and acquisition of multimodal argumentative strategies in academic and professional contexts.
