Sentence examples for argumentative of from inspiring English sources
The phrase "argumentative of" is not a correct or usable phrase in written English
While "argumentative" is an adjective used to describe something that expresses or involves strong disagreement, the suffix "-ive of" is not used in this context. Instead, you can use other phrases with the adjective "argumentative" such as "argumentative behavior", "argumentative tone", or "argumentative manner" in a sentence. For example: "He had an argumentative manner when discussing politics."
TRAGEDY can bring together the most argumentative of people.
On leaving São Paulo, this is what stays with me most about Schendel: the contradictory nature of her character (loving but argumentative); of her work (delicate but profound); and of her identity (European but Brazilian; Jewish but also Catholic, or atheist, or maybe all of the above).
Generally one of the most argumentative of rappers – beef for breakfast, lunch and dinner – The Game released a single called Don't Shoot in the wake of the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, featuring an impressive lineup of guest stars including Diddy and Rick Ross.
Our analysis of the interviews applied the proposal of argumentative analysis of natural logic.
(iii) In dealing with methods of traditional rhetoric, Aristotle obviously assumes that even methods that have traditionally been used instead of argumentation can be refined so that they support the aim of an argumentative style of rhetoric.
There was also some discussion about the epistemic status of the argumentative scheme of the dialectical syllogism and the conclusions from probable premises.
In some of the lecture series, there is a good deal of repetition and argumentative flaccidity of a sort the young Schlegel would no doubt have sharply criticized.
Mara also engaged in struggles with dialogic voicing and external voice use, revealing the importance at times in argumentative writing of identifying voices of external voices and the self when writing.
This paper pursues the question of how different modes of social action, represented in argumentative claims of participants, influence social coordination in these governance arenas.
Organised alphabetically – three consecutive entries were "bourgeois", "bureaucracy" and "capitalism" – Keywords seemed both madly ambitious and of broad interest in the argumentative Britain of the mid-70s.
Moreover, the several illustrations and analogies in the chapter all admit of multiple interpretations, while the argumentative structure of the chapter, upon which one might rely to force one interpretation over another, is regrettably thin.
