The phrase "argumentative discourse" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing debates, discussions, or any form of communication that involves presenting arguments or counterarguments.
Example: "The professor emphasized the importance of engaging in argumentative discourse to develop critical thinking skills."
Alternatives: "debate discourse" or "contentious dialogue".
The three criteria of a cogent argument, individually necessary and jointly sufficient, lead to a conception of fallacy as "any argument that violates one of the criteria of good argument … and is committed frequently in argumentative discourse" (1993, 317 18).
The result should be practical tools for on-line news providers... and deeper understanding of the nature of informal argumentative discourse".
Consequently, the orator the person who presents an argument either by speech or in writing to an audience of listeners or readers must seek to build his argumentative discourse on theses already accepted by his audience.
The distinction between argumentative discourse and redescription corresponds to that between propositions and vocabularies.
Classical decision making is combined with argumentative discourse among decision makers.
Eloquence includes sermons, essays, argumentative discourse, and other categories that we today would regard as too overtly didactic to be fine art (E).
The differentiation of argumentative discourses.
The results showed that the transactive discussion script facilitates argumentative knowledge construction during discourse.
The argumentative work of modernist discourse was achieved at these events partly by the mutually reinforcing activities of stakeholders from different sectors as industry representatives demonstrated their products, academics offered research findings, policymakers launched new documents or themes and journalists asked questions.
Argumentative differences among the World, Discourse, and Meditations and Principles may then be seen as arising from the fact that in the 1630s Descartes had not yet presented his metaphysics and so adopted an empirical mode of justification, whereas after 1641 he could appeal to his published metaphysics in seeking to secure the general framework of his physics.
Such attention was a significant means for taking an argumentative orientation where specific forms of discourse and intratextual work were essential ingredients.
