Sentence examples for argumentation to support from inspiring English sources

The mutakallimūm, theologians who used reason and argumentation to support their revealed Islamic beliefs, developed the temporal version of the argument from the impossibility of an infinite regress, known as the kalām argument.

Throughout, we offer evaluation and complementary argumentation to support our design choices, and also offer discussion on future directions and open research questions.

This would mean that the description of the causal chain captured by their model is complemented by argumentation analysis to support their recommendations, thereby highlighting the process by which the results-recommendation relationship is created.

The cases deal with issues as diverse as: the modeling of winemaking fermentation; the choice of a food packaging material; the design of solid foam cereal products; argumentation modeling to support multistakeholder decision-making, and the control of freeze-drying for eco-design purposes.

To address this problem we introduce a semi-structured formalism for argumentation, called LAF-ensembles, capturing a set of essential features of structured arguments and define a class of set based argumentation frameworks appropriate to support a semantic assessment of arguments for LAF-ensembles.

The argumentation he develops to support this claim is articulated in two stages: (1) he demonstrates that the intellect is able to know what is singular, since it can easily distinguish universals from singulars.

We therefore consider our argumentation to be supported by the view of those authors who state that Likert scale data can be analysed this way [ 7, 27].

There is also a need to understand how questions are used in schools of different social contexts to support argumentation (Chin & Osborne, 2010a).

Hence in the design of this task to support argumentation, we took into account Berland and McNeil's (2010) four vantage point that could alter the complexity of a problem: (1) the complexity of the questions, (b) the size of the data set, (c) the appropriateness of data and (d) the level of scaffolds.

Sadly, religion remains as the only point of reference to support argumentation against equality on this front.

Similarly, participants affirmed that argumentation could be used to support the need for patients' engagement in a treatment plan.