Sentence examples for argumentation through from inspiring English sources

Rather, to ground the multi-dimensional system of validity claims, one must supplement semantic analysis with a pragmatic analysis of the different sorts of argumentative discourse the different "logics of argumentation"—through which each type can be intersubjectively justified (TCA 1: 8–42).

A nine-day intervention was implemented in a 7th-grade all-girls classroom with the objective of improving the students' evidential argumentation through the use of statistical sampling concepts.

Following Stenhouse's view that evaluation should serve 'curriculum betterment' (1975), this article reports on an action research project which evaluated a pedagogic model for EAP at a UK university: the 'oral presentation sandwich' was a curriculum innovation aimed at developing L2 students' argumentation through a process writing approach.

There have been analyses and frameworks for such arguments, e.g. Toulmin's work on reasoning (Toulmin [1958]) and Ravenscroft's online system (Ravenscroft [2007]) for prompting argumentation through types of sentence openers.

Argumentation through 'core services' has also appeared in previous studies on outsourcing and contracting out but the consensus on the content of these services has remained elusive (e.g. [ 9, 11, 22, 24, 31]).

What reason does, rather, is help us justify our beliefs and actions to others, convince them through argumentation, and evaluate the justifications and arguments that others address to us.

Elaborating on the distinction drawn by Reus-Smit between realist and constructivist approaches, we distinguish normative-ideational power (influence through argumentation and suasion, dear to constructivists) from material-physical power (influence through the manipulation of threats and coercion, emphasised by realists).

"Victory through Argumentation: Verbal tactics for anyone white and normal," he wrote in the invitation.

No original work is going to be welcomed with open arms by all, and the writer is not doing their job if they don't make a case for their idea of writing through argumentation, debate, and fervour.

This article instead focuses on their doctrinal form, or modes of argumentation and analysis through which facts are assessed in relation to legal directives, to illuminate how many of the assumptions about substantive policy goals and risks tend to be coupled with other assumptions about the way international law operates in this field.

I explore 1) the strategies people employ to digest the overwhelming amount of information they encounter 2) how depending on outside knowledge influences our sense of our own abilities 3) how we access knowledge (or fail to do so) through argumentation.