The phrase "argumentation regarding" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing or analyzing a particular topic or issue, often in academic or formal contexts.
Example: "The argumentation regarding climate change policies has become increasingly complex in recent years."
Alternatives: "discussion about" or "debate on".
Using the same argumentation regarding Ψ as for the calculation of (76), it follows that F ( 3, 3 ) = 2 γ 2 T s 2 σ Ψ 2 b H A H E H EA b = 2 γ 2 T s 2 W σ Ψ 2 | a 0|2 2 + | a 2 | 2. (81).
Besides the above argumentation regarding the density and the solubility in water, there is another point that must be considered.
Following the same argumentation regarding optimal immobilization, 250 nm beads prepared with 60-fold excess of oligonucleotides perform optimally.
Further argumentation regarding differences in gas-exchange values is restricted by the lack of methodological information in García-Núñez et al. (2004) and Azócar et al. (2007).
Furthermore, as an extension of our previous argumentation regarding the importance of work control for fertility decision-making, it is expected that a heightened level of work control is more important in countries with less institutional support in the form of childcare availability.
We found that such factors appeared most strongly in the argumentations regarding heat (mortality and indirect effects), vector-borne diseases, food- and waterborne diseases, and flooding (mortality).
As mentioned before, concept mapping and argumentation are regarded as two higher order thinking enhancing techniques.
Regarding argumentation, Bowell and Kemp believe that we are often faced with arguments that endeavor to convince us, to influence our beliefs and actions, by giving us some reasons to believe this or that, or to act in this way or that.
Regarding argumentation, for instance, Kelly and Bazerman (2003) endeavored to understand the ways students engaged in the scientific reasoning associate general theoretical claims to complete data in making evidence.
In this line of argumentation, vulnerability is regarded as a subjectively attributed feature of societies that cannot be described by quantitative methods alone, but is rather a highly contextual characteristic that is not readily transferable to other contexts (Kelman et al. 2015).
As emphasized in Roberts (2007) Vision II of scientific literacy, one core competence relevant to scientific literacy should be engagement in argumentation and decision making regarding SSI. Lee et al. (2012) also highlighted students should be educated holistically and be able to respond to SSI with their own character and values (Lee, et al. 2012).
