Sentence examples for argumentation perspective from inspiring English sources

Other scholars like Klahr and Dunbar from the information processing perspective, Kuhn et al. from the epistemology perspective, and Osborne from the argumentation perspective proposed different interpreting on scientific reasoning (Klahr and Dunbar 1988; D. Kuhn et al. 2008; Osborne 2013).

From this perspective, argumentation is a significant tool that is instrumental in the growth of scientific knowledge (Kitcher 1988) as well as a vital component of scientific discourse (Pera 1994).

The study provides evidence for how science educators worldwide have situated argumentation from different perspectives within the educative domain thereby generating pedagogical, curricular and instructional explanations on how argumentation in science education can be conceptualized.

Asking questions that are hypothetical in nature promoted the construction of argumentation from multiple perspectives and triggered fellow discussants to consider propositions to support a claim and refute others.

One of the contributions of our analysis is the illustration that researchers studying argumentation from a linguistic perspective have been emphasizing related concepts in different ways.

A high percentage of research articles (90.2%) in all three journals considered argumentation from epistemic and/or linguistic perspective (Table 3).

Likewise, we contend that within science education, the study of how argumentation studies have been informed by foundational perspectives is important in setting the scene for potential reciprocal interdisciplinary investigations of argumentation (Erduran & Jimenez-Aleixandre 2007) with contributions of science education research to other fields.

The model suggested that cognitive processes employed this approach of using questions allowed for more valid inferences and encouraged students to consider multiple perspectives during problem solving and argumentation.

These keywords were identified considering the relation of argumentation to the communicative competencies and socio-cultural perspectives.

Rather than beginning from a logical or epistemological perspective they start with the role of argumentation in overcoming interpersonal disagreements.

There are at least three theoretical bodies of research framing argumentation studies: (a) developmental psychology, including the distributed cognition perspective; (b) language sciences, for instance the theory of communicative action; and (c) science studies, for instance, drawing on history, philosophy and sociology of science.