Sentence examples for argumentation model from inspiring English sources

A design dialog process based upon a design argumentation model is described.

CATO's argumentation model and instructional environment are a contribution to the research fields of AI and Law, Case-Based Reasoning, and AI and Education.

The study of extension-based semantics within the seminal abstract argumentation model of Dung has largely focused on definitional, algorithmic and complexity issues.

It is based on the results of an exploratory case study conducted with 162 students who participated in the implementation of a strategy, with a design that took into account problem-based learning, the Toulmin argumentation model, curriculum competence approach, cognitive and situated learning, and contextual foundations of education.

Some scholars argued that the educational framework of scientific explanation and educational framework of scientific argumentation should not share the Toulmin's argumentation model as their philosophical base (Osborne and Patterson 2011, 2012).

For example, using a dynamic graphical representation, students can explore the learner model and challenge claims, warrants and backings (based on Toulmin's (1959) argumentation model that uses data, claims, warrants, rebuttals and backings) and receive justifications from the system.

The cases deal with issues as diverse as: the modeling of winemaking fermentation; the choice of a food packaging material; the design of solid foam cereal products; argumentation modeling to support multistakeholder decision-making, and the control of freeze-drying for eco-design purposes.

We continue by outlining how a number of foundational contributions provided the basis for the formulation of argumentation models and their promotion in AI related settings and then consider a number of new themes that have emerged in recent years, many of which provide the principal topics of the research presented in this volume.

Discourse practices of science, such as argumentation, modeling, and critiquing, are central in version 2, while these practices are missing in version 1 (Duschl and Grandy 2013).

There is also recent work on translating different argumentation models.

Regarding different argumentation models, a reduction-based approach was implemented for recursive, probabilistic defeasible logic programming (RP-DeLP).