The phrase "argumentation it" is not correct and does not make sense in written English.
It appears to be a fragment or a misconstructed phrase that lacks clarity and context.
Example: "In the debate, the argumentation it presented was compelling." (Note: This example is incorrect due to the phrase itself.)
Alternatives: "the argument" or "the reasoning".
It can be part of explanations of why reasonable people make mistakes in arguments or argumentation: it may be due in part to an argument's appearing to be better than it really is.
But this book is quite exuberantly devoid of political argumentation; it is a loving portrait of a rambunctious monster, warts and all.
Along the same line of argumentation, it may very well be that a policy maker is best placed to answer the questions.
Following this line of argumentation, it is argued that migrants are more reliant on close forms of co-operation in their immediate vicinity.
If there were a way to track a student's cognitive process during argumentation, it would then be possible for us to trace their alternative conceptions in science.
Following this argumentation, it is remarkable to observe a strong PL quenching effect in this solid liquid donor acceptor system.
There is also an "emotional stake that philosophers often have and betray in their argumentation", which "it's dangerous and also even verges on offensive to draw attention" to.
This alleged affinity between the true and the persuasive justifies Aristotle's project of a rhetoric that essentially relies on the persuasiveness of pertinent argumentation; and it is just this argumentative character of Aristotelian rhetoric that explains the close affinity between rhetoric and dialectic (see above §3).
It is a baseless and fallacious mode of argumentation, and it is time that we start to challenge these forms of argumentation.
This under the bizarre argumentation that it, the oil industry, "needs all the resources it has to find and develop new energy sources" ("Industry Flexes Muscle... .., NY Times 12.14.07).
Although Aristotle's syllogistic logic dominated logic for centuries, it eventually revealed itself inadequate for the representation of mathematical argumentation, and it finally became displaced by the advent of modern quantificational logic, which originated with George Boole's algebraic approach to logic and Gottlob Frege's approach to logic and quantification (1879).
