The phrase "argumentation is based on" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the foundational principles or premises that support a particular argument or line of reasoning.
Example: "In this essay, I will demonstrate how effective argumentation is based on sound evidence and logical reasoning."
Alternatives: "argumentation relies on" or "argumentation depends on".
The argumentation is based on the assumption that 'knowing about' context and 'knowing about' lexis is contained and maintained within a networked cognitive system.
This argumentation is based on the assumption that the PISA assessments in math, science, and problem solving are able to measure students' competence as outcomes, which are directly linked to their education (Bulle [2011]; Kind [2013]).
This section therefore shows how and why Delphi will improve the ethical-decisions based on the utilities in other specific areas, and the argumentation is based on the fuzzy logic in which there are no single results, but instead a whole range of them.
A popular approach for obtaining proof procedures for abstract argumentation is based on so called dialogue games (see, e.g., [35,39]).
The teaching and learning of argumentation are based on premises that are consistent with the wider literature in science education, namely in framing science learning in terms of the appropriation of community practices that provide the structure, motivation and modes of communication required to sustain scientific discourse (Kelly & Chen 1999; Lemke 1990).
The major events on which the argumentation is based like the northern range expansion from the LAR to SHZ, the fragmentation of the LUB population and other events inferred by the NCA are thus congruent with the gene-flow pattern suggested by Migrate (Fig. 4).
Just to mention one quite obvious example: An ethical deliberation on a utilitarian basis will usually need other empirical information than an argumentation which is based on a Kantian view of morality.
The "Answer Set Programming Argumentation Reasoning Tool" [30] is based on reductions to ASP as discussed in Section 3.3.
Much of the argumentation we present here is based on ideas we have separately presented elsewhere (Thomas and Read 2007; Koella et al. 2009; Read et al. 2009).
The concept underlying the "Dynamic Programming Argumentation Reasoning Tool" [42,115] is based on dynamic programming, where the instance is decomposed before solving (see Section 4.3).
In this paper we introduce a formalism for single-agent decision making that is based on Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks.
