Sentence examples for argumentation as from inspiring English sources

The general epistemic keywords 'inquiry' and 'expla-' were related to argumentation as much as the argumentation-specific epistemic keyword 'evidence' (25.0%).

The Pragma-dialectical theory stipulates a normative ideal of a critical discussion which serves both as a guide to the reconstruction of natural language argumentation as well as a standard for the evaluation of the analysed product of reconstruction.

At its best, a peer group produces an investigative and deliberate discussion that involves the presentation and testing of hypotheses, deduction and argumentation as well as the planning and evaluation of problemsolving processes.

The issues of how to distinguish the "same" from "different" kinds of things and how to identify particular individuals as belonging to one kind or another are central issues in Mohist semantics and epistemology, and through them, in the Mohist theory of argumentation as well.

Protagoras' development of the techniques of antilogic, rooted in his claim that there are two opposed arguments on every matter (D.L. 9.51), seems likely to have been inspired by Zeno's novel forms of argumentation as well as by his advocacy of the most counter-intuitive of theses.

The aims of the analysis were: (A) to identify implicit biological background assumptions that underlie the scientific argumentation as well as research hypotheses about risk of GM stacks, and (B) to test whether differing biological background assumptions are central to the opposing positions.

His argumentation was as beautiful as it was unbelievable: "I feel the deep ethical and political responsibility to put to your judgment all I have done, successes and failures".

ASPARTIX also offers a web front-end, where any argumentation framework as well as its extensions can be inspected graphically.

From the above and by similar argumentations as in Steps 1-3 of the proof of Theorem 8(I) we conclude that all assumptions of Theorem 8(I) hold and the assertion (A1) of Theorem 8(I) does not hold.

Their argumentation is shallow as well as pretentious.

The interviews were informed by earlier investigations in the field of doctor-patient argumentation [ 26], as well as by input from doctors taking part in the study.