The phrase "argumentation about" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing or analyzing a particular topic or issue in a formal or academic context.
Example: "The argumentation about climate change policies has become increasingly polarized in recent years."
Alternatives: "discussion regarding" or "debate on".
So the first step in sound argumentation about property is distinguishing those arguments which support the existence of property in general from arguments which support the existence of a system of a specific kind (Waldron 1988).
Such beneficence-based arguments are common patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technologies, but they risk to uncritically accept scientists' assumptions.
It applies, as a term, to any argumentation about literature, whether or not specific works are analyzed.
During the activities, pre-service teachers designed their own experiments, made researches about their concepts and made argumentation about experiments.
Finally, on perhaps the universal scale, I saw impassioned argumentation about the desirability of and the strategies for someday modifying the climate of Mars to make it more earthlike-in other words, to "terraform" it.
The field unites a number of disparate research traditions with different intellectual programs, but it also provides an arena for principled argumentation about the existence of a common human nature.
Argumentations about higher incidence of surgical complications in case of using resectoscope instead of small diameter scopes with micro scissors or Versapoint seem to be more subjective impressions of some authors rather than evidence-based [10, 30].
The most important reason for this position is that while the general need for empirical information in applied ethics is non-controversial, the specific kind of information which is required in argumentations about certain topics is dependent on the normative-ethical background which underlies the ethical evaluation [ 16, 17].
In this study, a group argumentation test about a social highlighted event is introduced based on our designed group argumentation environment (GAE).
Hence, in this paper we extend Dung's theory to accommodate arguments that claim preferences between other arguments, thus incorporating meta-level argumentation based reasoning about preferences in the object level.
Results indicated that students with more elaborate internal collaboration scripts about argumentation (measured by their performance in analyzing a discourse protocol) contributed more appropriate arguments to discussions than students with less elaborate internal collaboration scripts.
