Sentence examples for argument strategy from inspiring English sources

In this final section, we briefly consider ways in which the argument strategy employed here (and described in section 2) might be generalised.

He thus adopts the Mohists' consequentialist argument strategy in order to argue against their conclusions.[13] Consequentialist moral theories can be distinguished along a number of dimensions.

However, as we saw in the case of Strawson, whether or not such full-blooded Kantian commitments are necessary to the transcendental argument strategy is a matter of dispute.

It is hard to find philosophers who still think that normative questions can be resolved by linguistic considerations, but there are, surprisingly, some who do think that this argument strategy is essentially correct.

In section 7, we will consider how the argument strategy employed here to justify Probabilism for agents with precise credences might be employed to establish other norms either for agents also represented as having precise credences or for agents represented in other ways.

Paull and Sider pointed out that these argument strategies are no good (1992).

These holdings helped shut down several promising argument strategies available to Crummell.

But they were nonetheless one of Xunzi's most important influences: although he rejected Mohist positions, to a large extent he adopted their argument strategies; he also seems to have learned a great deal from the Mohist conception of fa (models, standards).

This entry will attempt to provide a broad overview of the central themes of Leibniz's philosophy of physics, as well as an introduction to some of the principal arguments and argumentative strategies he used to defend his positions.

The theory behind this module was borrowed from van Eemeren and colleagues [ 36]. 3) Argument schemes Argument schemes An argument scheme is a strategy of argumentation that reveals the link between the premises and a standpoint to be defended [ 42].

In broad brush-strokes, Ryle's argument-strategy against the supposition that generally intelligent or rational abilities can be explained in terms of prior theoretical operations (involving the apprehension of the relevant truths) is to exhibit how the supposition leads to logically vicious regresses.