The phrase "argument set out" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the presentation or explanation of a particular argument in a discussion or text.
Example: "In the following sections, we will analyze the argument set out in the previous chapter."
Alternatives: "argument presented" or "argument outlined".
The tribunal rejected the argument, set out in existing Home Office guidance, that Eritreans could return safely by signing a letter of apology and paying a "diaspora tax".
It was hard not to hear a direct challenge to the argument set out by Mitt Romney, his vanquished Republican foe, and the Republicans' vice-presidential running-mate, Paul Ryan.
The Australian political consultant, who ran the Conservative party's election campaign, said that the argument set out in the report compiled by Dame Margaret Beckett was "arrogant" because it assumed that voters were wrong.
This echoes the argument set out in a paper by Joseph Massad of Columbia University, who adopts a nationalist line in claiming that gay rights in the Middle East are a "missionary" project orchestrated by the west.
The argument set out in the preceding section is just such an argument.
Sometimes, as in premise (5) in the argument set out above, the appeal is to the mere existence of any evil whatever.
MacPherson's letter summarised the arguments set out in a 76-page analysis paper explaining the Treasury's objections to a currency union.
In some respects, this volume is a continuation of arguments set out in "America Alone," the authors' estimable 2004 book, which examined the role neoconservatives played in shaping the administration's post-9/11 policy and its decision to invade Iraq.
5. The case for inheritance tax Echoing the arguments set out in Thomas Piketty's bestselling book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Ebdon made the case for a global tax on inherited wealth.
Their arguments, set out with ostensible sweet reason by the RHS presidents, are that academic publishing as currently constituted guarantees high standards; that any change affecting costs and benefits needs a lead time far longer than the one year proposed, and that the change would unreasonably restrict academics in their choice of where to publish.
Prosecutor it seems rehearsed the arguments set out in detail here: http://t.co/PDLwtg1H2J July 16 , 20143.37pm BST A small crowd – possibly some WikiLeaks supporters; undoubtedly plenty of journalists – has begun to congregate outside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where Assange has been holed up for over two years.
