The phrase "argument section" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as academic writing, essays, or discussions where a specific part of a text presents arguments or reasoning.
Example: "In the argument section of the paper, the author presents compelling evidence to support their thesis."
Alternatives: "debate section" or "discussion section".
Each argument section or subsection should begin with an argumentative point heading.
In the conclusion of the argument section of his brief, for example, Bragg argues that Rosedale's "representations and inducements properly form the basis of specific jurisdiction against Defendant Rosedale". Pl.'s Resp. at 14.
Here again, slight modification of Moyer's argument (Section 4.3.4) can be used to show that weak and strong multiple domain supervenience are equivalent when the supervening set is intrinsic.
Clitomachus defended the consistency of a radical skepticism of this sort by denying that assent is necessary for action or belief, as the Stoics had claimed in their inactivity objection to the Academic corollary argument (section 3.1 above).
As set out in section 4, three major contributions in the 1960s profoundly altered the face of compatibilism: the incompatibilists' Consequence Argument (section 4.1), Frankfurt's attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP) (section 4.2), and Strawson's focus upon the reactive attitudes (section 4.3).
This section is the "argument" section.
The dictionary values are assumed to be arrays and follow the same rules as if given individually, as described in the "Column contents: separate arguments" section below.
Still, this initial argument captures what is most basically at issue, especially in slow switch arguments (section 3). 5.
Nonetheless there are times when the more mainstream quantitative methods can provide powerful resources for making feminist arguments (section Feminist Equity Critiques).
Numerous variants of the argument for this claim can be found in the literature, and the most prominent ones take the transcendental form (see the entry on transcendental arguments, section 5).
Based on general arguments, section four draws basic conclusions.
