The phrase "argument scheme" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to logic, reasoning, or argumentation, particularly in academic or analytical discussions.
Example: "In his analysis, he employed an argument scheme to illustrate the logical structure of the debate."
Alternatives: "argument structure" or "reasoning framework".
The theory behind this module was borrowed from van Eemeren and colleagues [ 36]. 3) Argument schemes Argument schemes An argument scheme is a strategy of argumentation that reveals the link between the premises and a standpoint to be defended [ 42].
We next provide an argument scheme and an associated set of critical questions which is able to capture these features.
In order that both the argument scheme and the critical questions can be given precise interpretations we use the semantic structure of an Action-Based Althenating Transition System as the basis for their definition.
In this paper we describe an approach to practical reasoning, reasoning about what it is best for a particular agent to do in a given situation, based on presumptive justifications of action through the instantiation of an argument scheme, which is then subject to examination through a series of critical questions.
Once we recognize the argumentative structure of the advertisement, we can go further, and consider whether it should be understood as an instance of an argument scheme (a standard pattern of argument).
1430: Yuqing Tang, Nir Oren, Simon Parsons and Katia Sycara: Dempster-Shafer argument schemes.
The framework explicitly caters for argument schemes, accrual of arguments, and burden of proof; these concepts appear in many types of argument, and are particularly useful in dialogues revolving around evidential reasoning.
Within informal logic, the key argument schemes discussed include arguments from authority, causal reasoning, arguments by analogy, and various forms of moral argument.
One cannot assume that approaches which emphasize fallacies will, for example, have the same results as those which emphasize argument schemes or rules of dialogue.
In both cases one finds an attempt to identify general criteria for good reasoning and argument schemes that incorporate specific forms of reasoning.
The latter is often manifest in the study of structures for good inference ("argument schemes") which set standards for particular kinds of good reasoning.
