The phrase "argument proposes" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is commonly used when discussing or presenting an argument or idea. Here are a few examples: - The speaker's argument proposes a new solution to the ongoing issue of climate change. - The essay's main argument proposes that government intervention is necessary to address income inequality. - The author's argument proposes that education is the key to reducing poverty in developing countries. In these examples, "argument proposes" is used to introduce or describe the main idea or proposal being presented in the argument or essay. It can also be used in a sentence like, "The argument proposes a different perspective on the topic," to show that the argument is offering a unique viewpoint or approach.
This returns us to the Ontological Argument, or at least the objectionable idea at its heart, for the necessary being that the Cosmological Argument proposes is also the idea of a being whose essence involves existence.
The argument proposes a shift from animism to animacies as a way to think about these co-constitutive environments; it does not seek to provide a "pastoral blurring of the human offered by so many posthumanist accounts…" (79) but rather an investigation of bio- and techno-intimacy, where we become and are the products of an industrialized world.
This argument proposes that a reduced preference for masculine men and an increased preference for relationship commitment during the luteal phase, reflects an adaptive strategy that may minimise costs and provide increased paternal investment during times when the hormone profile mimics pregnancy [19].
The preceding argument proposes that the decision to forage is based on behavioral interactions.
In essence, this argument proposes that the brain is more or less a tabula rasa upon which sexual differentiation of behavior is a consequence of unequal sensation and experience produced by sex differences in peripheral structures.
First, the general "additivity-to-background" argument proposes that if an agent enhances an already existing disease-causing process, then even small exposures increase disease incidence in a linear manner.
Thus, a prime functional argument proposed for the origin of some Australian regional features is not supported by these data.
This curious argument, proposed by the White House and presented in court by Donald Verrilli, the solicitor-general, was attacked by both wings of the court.
The "Chinese Room" argument, proposed in 1980 by John Searle, a philosophy professor at the University of California, Berkeley, is intended to show that no computer running software could possibly manifest understanding or be conscious.
To the untrained ear, much of what goes on in the courtroom sounds like sophistry – testing the strength of a legal argument, proposing and exploring hypotheticals, scrutinising language, semantics, technicalities.
Why did the MCB apparently give in to the pressure and vilification of the pro-Zionist lobby and those who could not bring themselves to listen to the argument proposed by the MCB and other organisations if nothing had changed?
