The phrase "argument of material" is not commonly used in written English and may be unclear without context.
It could potentially be used in discussions related to philosophy, logic, or material science, where one might refer to the reasoning or rationale concerning a specific material.
Example: "In the debate about sustainable resources, the argument of material used in construction plays a crucial role in determining environmental impact."
Alternatives: "material rationale" or "material reasoning".
But whereas Shaftesbury simply infers without further argument the reduction of material to mental beauty from the premise that material beauty is the effect of mind, Reid takes up instance after instance of material beauty, arguing with respect to each that it is best understood as a "sign" of some instance of mental beauty.
In exposition (chapter 5), readers face the inverse challenge: finding a line of argument in material that has strong narrative tendencies.
Secondly, he adopts Hegel's argument that different distributions of material goods to specific individuals tend to make explicit different personalities in these individuals.
And since atoms, conceived as partless point-instant are ultimately insubstantial, the realist argument for the existence of material objects as conglomerates of parts must be false (VVS ad 11 14; for detailed discussion of some of these arguments, see Kapstein 1988; Tola & Dragonetti 2004, 98 110; Gold 2006).
But I repeat: Arguments over the removal of material are not the most difficult part of this discussion.
Rier [ 14] commented on the scarcity of novel arguments within the content of material he observed.
The Affinity Argument points to the complexity of material particulars.
Your college papers may be the last coherent writing you ever have to do where you will be judged and carefully critiqued on your ability to "substantiate an argument" or assimilate a piece of material.
He follows in the footsteps of earlier humanists such as Lorenzo Valla (1406 57) and Rudolph Agricola (1443 85), who set about to replace the scholastic curriculum, based on syllogistic and disputation, with a treatment of logic oriented toward the use of the topics, a technique of verbal association aiming at the invention and organization of material for arguments, and persuasion.
Hume offers a rather cryptic argument to show that our approval of material honesty must be the product of collaborative human effort (convention).
