The phrase "argument is put" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the presentation or assertion of a particular argument in a debate or written work.
Example: "In the article, the argument is put that climate change is primarily driven by human activity."
Alternatives: "argument is presented" or "argument is stated".
He wrote on the LabourList website: "The argument is put that any work experience without payment in addition to benefits is exploitation.
In his report, compiled with Professor Linda Woodhead of Lancaster University, the argument is put forward that religious instruction should be left to Sunday schools and the like, while religious education takes on a wider moral theme.
He amiably concedes, however, that he doesn't think there is a concrete answer, and that "there are very persuasive arguments to be made for the idea" that Tony has, in fact, been shot dead in the final scene (one such argument is put forth, at great length, in an online essay titled "The Sopranos: Definitive Explanation of 'The END' ").
An argument is put forward to explain the magnitude of ϵth.
In this text, an argument is put forward for academics to take a proactive role in the development and use of technology in the teaching process.
The argument is put forward that securing a shared understanding of development conditions and risks needs to be predicated on creating more robust conditions for interaction and fostering a sounder appreciation of the inter-dependencies of natural processes and governance.
Ultimately, the crux of the argument is putting issues in front of the American people that demonstrate, incontrovertibly, that Keystone XL is a bad deal and a losing proposition for everyone other than oil companies and foreign interests.
His argument was put forward most thoroughly in a 1961 academic journal article, "Real and Pseudo Gold Standards".
"Policy clearly wasn't his strong point and this was a policy argument being put to me about a public-private partnership".
Regarding the due process argument being put forward by the New York Civil Liberties Union, it was accorded to Dylan by the school board meeting.
Unfortunately the act was watered-down in 1997 when the argument was put that it was the owners and not the dogs that were at fault - so dogs were given a second chance.
