Acharya's main argument is focusing on the decline of the American world order, rather than the decline of the US.
Originally, their argument was focused on the technical dangers of administering a YouTube filtering mechanism, rather than solely demonstrating how the government's patchwork ban on YouTube, pornography, and other nominated sites contravened the country's constitution.
Up to this point, the arguments are focused too heavily on whether its sustainable cultivation will save forests and benefit the lives of people that are for the most part, thousands of miles away from where it's grown.
Regardless, his arguments are focused less on his own image, safety and security, than they are at pointing global attention toward the expectation to privacy of American and international citizens.
Most arguments are focused on whether marine mammals can drink sea-water and whether marine mammals can excrete salt-concentrated urine.
But while these distant reaches of time serve to contextualise Challenger's argument, her interest is focused on more recent events, and in particular on what it means to be the species that drives other species out of existence.
This paper is focused on three-argument applicatives, which include both three-argument CAs and "ditransitive" applicatives.
