The phrase "argument is flawed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in a variety of contexts, including academic essays, debates, discussions, and critiques. Example: "The main argument presented in the article is flawed because it fails to consider the impact of cultural differences on the study's results."
Although your articles are what makes me go on living, your argument is flawed.
That Republican argument is flawed for many reasons, but one is not getting much attention: The Republicans are not opposed to every loophole.
But the argument is flawed if you assume house prices will continue to rise, as the minimum amount you are required to pay will also go up.
He offers an account of what happens to Mary in purely physical terms, while allowing that "perhaps this argument is flawed because it builds in the assumption to be tested" (that Mary's experience is entirely physical).
Showing that McTaggart's argument is flawed, because it relies on an ambiguity in the copula 'is', and that there is a way to construe passage that side-steps the traditional objections, moreover, does not show that eternalism is false but only that it is optional.
And, that argument is flawed.
Just as earlier global trade negotiations, such as the Tokyo and Uruguay rounds, dragged on for years, so today's negotiators might believe that the Doha talks can simply be put on hold; something will emerge eventually.Both lines of argument are flawed.
[Senate Finance Committee Chair Max Baucus] added that Kyl's economic argument was flawed, as well.
He added that Kyl's economic argument was flawed, as well.
* This totally did not at all actually happen because OBVIOUSLY SCROOGE IS ALL ABOUT PROFITS he just gets all huffy because what kind of person likes being proven that their original argument was flawed so that they have to learn something about their worldview and how they participate in shaping their own realities am I right?
However, she maintained that the argument was flawed as such a situation, which would enable and consolidate increased import of food from the developed to the developing world, could not lead to food security, a point that was also made by Hongladarom.
