Suggestions(1)
Exact(8)
The revival argument is controversial.
Davidson's argument is controversial.
The Internalist Argument is controversial for at least two reasons.
The fiducial argument is controversial, and it is generally agreed that its applicability is limited to particular statistical problems.
The argument is controversial since one might think that the principle (p⇒(p∨q)) should not be a theorem of a system aiming to express ordinary implication (see, e.g., Nelson 1930, 447).
While this argument is controversial (see Haslanger (1989), Johnston (1987) and Lowe (1988) for some responses), it does show how considerations about intrinsicality can resonate within quite different areas of metaphysics.
Similar(52)
The details of the argument are controversial.
Both premises of this argument are controversial.
Both of the steps of Benacerraf's argument are controversial.
While both steps of the argument are controversial, the second stage has come in for especially heavy fire (for a careful discussion of the dialectical significance of Jackson's argument, see Suikkanen 2010).
Both arguments are controversial.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com