Other philosophers refer to this view as "Cartesian skepticism" because of the skeptical arguments investigated by Descartes and his critics in the mid-17th century.
The second contrarian argument we investigated involved the claim that the global climate is not very sensitive to the increased greenhouse effect because the planet has some sort of natural climate response that will offset global warming.
Furthermore, the global Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional-order fuzzy Cohen-Grossberg neural networks with deviating argument is investigated.
In order to test this argument, we investigated the relationship between miRNA activities determined by these four programs and miRNA expression levels by using data in which both mRNA and miRNA expression from the same samples were measured.
These argumentation frameworks are usually derived during an instantiation process (see, e.g., [4,5]), where structured arguments are investigated with respect to their ability to contradict other such arguments; the actual notion of "contradicting" can be instantiated in many different forms (see, e.g., [6]).
These arguments are investigated in a simple slab model of landslip failures in a hillslope hollow subject to stochastic forcing over long periods of time.
The double-dispersion phenomenon in a Darcian, free convection boundary layer adjacent to a vertical wall, using multi-scale analysis arguments, was investigated by Telles and Trevisan [13].
To explain his argument, Stewart investigates the prevalence of deism: the belief that an impersonal God expects humans to reason out their own ethical codes.
In order to understand the dynamics of a second order delay differential equation with a piecewise constant argument, we investigate invariant curves of the derived planar mapping from the equation.
This allowed proof of concept to be established through convergent validation and basic interrater reliability testing, which in turn provided a cogent argument for investigating the CPAx further.
