Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(5)
The argument has been criticized theologically for presupposing an unacceptable image of God as rewarding such calculating worship and also on the philosophical ground that it is too permissive in that it could justify belief in the claims, however fantastic, of any person or group who threatened nonbelievers with damnation or other dangerous consequences.
The argument has been criticized repeatedly.
This sort of argument has been criticized because it moves from a premise about what humans are to a conclusion about how they ought to be.
Lewis' argument has been criticized e.g. by Kiourti 2010, Chapter 4. Lewis' objection works, at most, only if impossible worlds are taken as Lewisian concreta, as per Yagisawa's extended modal realism.
This novel epistemological argument has been criticized similarly to other probabilistic design arguments.
Similar(55)
This last statement has been criticized by Coleman and Truesdell.
Pagin's arguments have been criticized.
Both arguments have been criticized by a number of authors.
This argument, however, has been criticized as failing to observe the distinction between logical and ontological, or factual, necessity.
NAT is a classic argument in organizational sociology although it has been criticized as having imprecise definitions and lacking criteria for quantifying complexity.
These arguments are relevant, but the model has been criticized recently.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com