Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "argument for the claim" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the reasoning or evidence that supports a specific assertion or statement.
Example: "In her essay, she presented a compelling argument for the claim that climate change is primarily driven by human activity."
Alternatives: "justification for the assertion" or "supporting evidence for the statement".
Exact(22)
The argument for the claim that humans could not acquire knowledge of abstract objects proceeds as follows: (1) Humans exist entirely within space-time.
(For an argument for the claim that accommodating certain illusions poses significant difficulties for the disjunctivist, see Smith 2010).
What, then, is the argument for the claim that such a significant mistake in reasoning has been made?
Martin's argument for the claim that the alternatives to the disjunctive approach incur greater epistemic burdens primarily focuses on our understanding of the notion of a perfect hallucination.
First, one needs an argument for the claim that a proper treatment of cross-attitudinal anaphoric relations is possible only if semantic innocence is accepted.
Moreover, D2 contains an argument for the claim that if the one is, then there are infinitely many forms of oneness.
Similar(38)
Here are two arguments, though not very strong arguments, for the claim that the qualities are wide.
All the main arguments for the claim that patriotism is a duty, then, are exposed to serious objections.
Arguments for incompatibilism must, then, be arguments for the claim that necessarily, if determinism is true, we lack the free will we might otherwise have.
Arguments for the claim that the standard theory does not account for important aspects of agency are usually driven by a focus on distinctively human agency.
A number of Stoic arguments for the claim that the soul is a body have come down to us (see Annas 1992, 39-41).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com