The phrase "argument for compensation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where one is discussing reasons or justifications for receiving compensation, often in legal, employment, or insurance discussions.
Example: "The lawyer presented a compelling argument for compensation, highlighting the client's losses and the negligence of the other party."
Alternatives: "case for reimbursement" or "justification for payment".
Kenneth Munoz, the former general counsel for Madison Square Garden, witnessed the argument for compensation from the management side after Pat Riley resigned as coach of the Knicks and Mike Keenan left the Rangers.
"There's a good argument for compensation for those graduates who do go into postgraduate education to offset the additional debt – call it a bronze handshake, because it wouldn't be much money". Postgraduate education is big business for universities.
Compelling arguments for better compensation for CHW labour continue to surface in the qualitative literature [ 13– 13].
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has stated: "Taxpayers' argument that compensation for labor is not constitutionally subject to the federal income tax is without merit.
And although they wronged and harmed Tom and Beulah by never compensating them, my argument for Eulah's right to compensation relies only on the harms they suffered after Eulah's conception.
But the timing argument for Eulah's right to compensation does not claim that Tom and Beulah's former masters should compensate Tom and Beulah for the harms they suffered because their parents were enslaved.
The parents concerned were indeed distressed (and have been suing for compensation), but the utilitarian arguments for changing the law are strong ones.
Fourth, her claim for compensation is not confounded by the argument that she would not exist had the wrongs that caused her harms not occurred.
The plan will almost certainly not end the widening arguments over compensation for forced labor.
In advance of next month's meeting, that campaign took Mr. Disney and Mr. Gold to Mr. McGurn's Rockville, Md., office on Feb. 2. In their presentation, the two men outlined what they said was Mr. Eisner's excessive compensation and their argument for splitting the jobs of chief executive and chairman, Mr. McGurn said.
