The phrase "argument for a position" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a rationale or reasoning that supports a specific viewpoint or stance on an issue.
Example: "In her essay, she presented a compelling argument for a position that advocates for renewable energy sources."
Alternatives: "case for a viewpoint" or "justification for a stance".
A distinguishing characteristic of Bhāvaviveka's approach to Madhyamaka is his conviction that a Mādhyamika should put forward a positive argument for a position rather than merely showing the inadequacies of other positions.
A particularly qualified candidate can make an argument for a position with greater scope, which may result in more pay, and some job candidates have negotiated more stock relative to cash in their pay, but overall there is no haggling over salary for a set job description.
The former demonstrates how to construct arguments for a position one has already decided to adopt; the latter shows how to detect weaknesses in the arguments of others.
My point against Sullivan, then, is that it's important to know whether a candidate can offer discussable arguments for a position or merely holds it as a matter of religious faith.
If the president or the solicitor general were reluctant even to seem to personally endorse arguments they found morally repugnant, or if they feared that they might be accused of making only halfhearted arguments for a position they wished would not prevail, they might have appointed an outside advocate to make the case as a special assistant to the attorney general.
And while William's inventive mind could generate arguments for a position with ease, their quality is uneven: often he proposes problematic arguments without appearing to recognize the difficulties they contain, as may be apparent below to the discerning reader, while at other times he shows an acute awareness of the fundamental problems an issue raises.
To be clear, Levine's proposal is not that Darwin finds meaning in an alternative belief system, and in particular, Levine is not suggesting that Darwin offers an argument for such a position.
Generally the aid agencies on the ground come down on the consequentialist, pragmatic side of the argument, and opt for a position that allows them to continue doling out sacks of food, medicine and water pumps.
To strengthen your argument for a certain ethical position, you will need to cite reputable sources in your paper.
There are also mere paraphrases or summaries of certain texts, collections of arguments for a certain position, and sketches of larger projects that were never worked out.
And though it is unclear whether the title summa is original (Jordan 1986, 182 3), the work fits the summa form in its systematic arrangement of topics and its attempt to include all possible arguments for a given position and against its contrary.
