Sentence examples for argument evaluation from inspiring English sources

In this argumentation framework, the semantics of acceptance plays a fundamental role in the argument evaluation process.

All concept map qualities fall effectively within higher order abilities related with making meaning, deduction, argument evaluation, and interpretation, all of which are revelations of reasoning ability.

Rather, he distinguishes three aspects of argument-making practices: argument as product, as procedure, and as process, which he loosely aligns with the traditional perspectives on argument evaluation of logic, dialectic, and rhetoric.

The category of fallacies with problematic premises (reminiscent of Whately's "premises unduly assumed") shows a concern with argument evaluation over and beyond logical or inference evaluation, drawing the informal logic approach away from purely logical concerns towards an epistemic conception of fallacies.

To Ghanizadeh and Mirzaee, "all the above-mentioned qualities fall adequately within higher-order abilities associated with making meaning from text and reading between lines, such as inference-making, deduction, argument evaluation, and interpretation, all of which are manifestations of critical thinking ability" (p. 58).

Our study strengthens the argument that evaluations of ART programs in RLCs should consider not only the number of new patients started on ART, but also the number of patients retained in long-term care [ 30].

Clinical arguments supporting evaluation of EMH are (1) to determine the extent of EMH in the liver or spleen, (2) to determine the presence and evaluate the contribution of splenic erythropoiesis in patients under consideration for splenectomy, and (3) to evaluate mass lesions outside the liver and spleen to differentiate EMH from other processes.

We present a formal, mathematical model of argument structure and evaluation, taking seriously the procedural and dialogical aspects of argumentation.

This section can be brief because we can apply the lessons learned in the discussion of CP-style arguments to an evaluation of the Cartesian-style arguments that employ EADP.

Using categories identified from human multi-agent negotiation, we demonstrate how the logic can be used to specify argument formulation and evaluation.

The current study sought to begin developing the validity argument for the evaluation tool.