The phrase "argument entails" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing logical reasoning or the implications of a particular argument or claim.
Example: "In this debate, the argument entails a consideration of both ethical and practical implications."
Alternatives: "argument implies" or "argument necessitates".
Those who believe corporate offenders are privileged should confront the difficulties that argument entails.
So the driving premise of this skeptical argument entails the KK thesis, which we've seen reason to reject.
If so, the causal differences argument entails that Socrates's drinking hemlock at dusk, and Socrates's drinking hemlock at dusk, must differ as causal relata.
Anderson's argument entails that Vall's form of black nationalism is self-defeating: segregation itself works to prevent the white support for black communities and institutions for which such nationalism calls.
The argument entails, he claims, that citizens of one liberal-democratic state who are forcibly subjected to the rule of another liberal-democratic state immediately acquire political obligations to the second state as long as they are accorded full citizenship rights.
Usually, the argument entails reminding these individuals that the White House has passed the largest middle class tax cut in the nation's history.
We are always skeptical of the new paradigm argument that entails a momentum exaggeration on both the positive and negative side.
Thus, there is an inherent contradiction in the theologians' objection that if the continuous is potentially divisible infinitely, there must be a power, such as God, that can actualize all the potential divisions; for such an argument absurdly entails that what by definition cannot be completed is completed.
Cuneo and Shafer-Landau then offer a 'reversal argument', which entails that some conceptual truths about morality are 'fact-makers': that is, some of the facts about the distribution of moral properties are grounded in facts about moral concepts (ibid., 418 421).
To undermine that argument would entail going back and objecting to Nordenfelt's reasoning about health as being able to realize goals necessary and sufficient for minimal happiness; that is, a minimally flourishing, decent, non-humiliating life in the modern world.
These arguments would entail an independent proof for the NP-Completeness of o-COMPONENT.
