Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(1)
Such an argument does not claim that as a necessary condition of this premise there must exist such particulars.
Similar(59)
Given that our actual judgments are largely explained by affective responses to rule-prohibited actions, we have to either accept that emotions can justify or "give up the bulk of commonsense morality" (Nichols and Gill 2008: 153) This argument doesn't claim that emotions track moral truth or provide some kind of internalist epistemic justification.
Proponents of calibration arguments do not claim to give an account of how the equivalence relation is determined.
Dr Allsopp does not claim it.
He doesn't claim too much.
We do not claim to have provided knock-down objections to each of these arguments.
We do not claim synonymy.
But the timing argument for Eulah's right to compensation does not claim that Tom and Beulah's former masters should compensate Tom and Beulah for the harms they suffered because their parents were enslaved.
However Descartes, by endorsing that argument, does not endorse the claim that 'if I can conceive of A's existing without B's existing, then A can exist without B existing'.
It is pretty clear that Plantinga's argument does not show what he claims that it shows.
To be sure, the rebuttal of Strawson's argument does not suffice to establish (Claim 1), but it keeps process philosophy in the running.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com