The phrase "argument claiming that" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when introducing a specific argument or assertion made by someone in a discussion or analysis.
Example: "The argument claiming that climate change is primarily caused by human activity has gained significant traction in recent years."
Alternatives: "assertion stating that" or "claim suggesting that".
Even senior politicians make this argument, claiming that we have an "open border" with Europe.
Perhaps an argument claiming that a blog isn't yet another displacement activity brings a smile to your face.
Although Sagarin and Skowronski concede this, they discount Chen's argument, claiming that for revealed preferences to completely account for observed choice-effects the relationship between choice and preference would have to be unrealistically high.
The state's argument in this case rests on two claims: a technical and procedural argument claiming that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) violated the Administrative Procedural Act (APA) by failing to meet its notice-and-comment requirement, and a broader argument claiming that entirety of the executive actions are unconstitutional and an example of federal overreach.
Today Jonathan Chait makes a related argument, claiming that "conservatives hate all legislation now": Lowry and Kristol urge House Republicans to kill immigration reform, because passing it would involve legislating, and legislating is bad.
The builders reject this argument, claiming that the decomposition of the plywood begins on the sheathing's top surface, under the shingles, and not on the underside, where ventilation might help.
This argument claims that the conventional fine arts have diminished in significance, leaving only those innovators who have "embraced technology" as worthy of our attention.
The economic argument claims that free trade leads to increasing levels of interdependence between states, thus decreasing the chances of war.
The third argument claimed that liberty is an imperfection.
One crucial premise in the skeptical hypothesis argument claims that nothing can rule out moral nihilism.
Kripke's modal argument claims that names differ from definite descriptions in that they are rigid designators.
