The phrase "argument claiming" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a specific assertion or position taken within a debate or discussion.
Example: "The argument claiming that climate change is a hoax lacks substantial evidence."
Alternatives: "assertion stating" or "claim suggesting".
Even senior politicians make this argument, claiming that we have an "open border" with Europe.
Perhaps an argument claiming that a blog isn't yet another displacement activity brings a smile to your face.
Although Sagarin and Skowronski concede this, they discount Chen's argument, claiming that for revealed preferences to completely account for observed choice-effects the relationship between choice and preference would have to be unrealistically high.
Defenders of the Electoral College dismiss this argument, claiming the present system strikes a political balance between states and regions that the Founding Fathers envisioned.
The state's argument in this case rests on two claims: a technical and procedural argument claiming that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) violated the Administrative Procedural Act (APA) by failing to meet its notice-and-comment requirement, and a broader argument claiming that entirety of the executive actions are unconstitutional and an example of federal overreach.
Today Jonathan Chait makes a related argument, claiming that "conservatives hate all legislation now": Lowry and Kristol urge House Republicans to kill immigration reform, because passing it would involve legislating, and legislating is bad.
This argument claims that the conventional fine arts have diminished in significance, leaving only those innovators who have "embraced technology" as worthy of our attention.
The economic argument claims that free trade leads to increasing levels of interdependence between states, thus decreasing the chances of war.
The third argument claimed that liberty is an imperfection.
One crucial premise in the skeptical hypothesis argument claims that nothing can rule out moral nihilism.
Conversely, one crucial premise in the regress argument claims that no moral belief can be justified non-inferentially.
