The phrase "argument at issue" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the specific point of contention or debate in a discussion or argument.
Example: "In the debate about climate change, the argument at issue revolves around the effectiveness of renewable energy sources."
Alternatives: "disputed argument" or "contentious point".
After all, if the argument at issue would also justify skepticism regarding perceptual belief and/or memorial and/or introspective belief, it shows nothing distinctively problematic about intuitions or beliefs based upon them.
While running afoul of this constraint does not provide reason to think the argument at issue unsound, it appears a reasonable constraint on a skeptical argument meant to produce reflectively justified belief in a conclusion in virtue of its following from justified premises.
PARIS — It is a measure of France's confusion about Islam and its own Muslim citizens that in the political furor here over "banning the burqa," as the argument goes, the garment at issue is not really the burqa at all, but the niqab.
Still, this initial argument captures what is most basically at issue, especially in slow switch arguments (section 3). 5.
His views (if he has any) are not at issue in the argument.
Friends of the knowledge argument will say that the facts at issue are non-physical because they involve the exemplification of non-physical properties (e.g. of the property of having an experience with quality Q).
It is fair to note that for Psillos, the fact that a rule-circular argument does not guarantee a positive conclusion about the rule at issue is not sufficient for such an argument to be valid.
Both objections seem mistaken: Dworkin, for example, is committed to the rational determinacy of law in exactly the sense at issue for the Replacement argument.
However, as we saw above, whether it is a skeptical argument or a pedestrian case that is at issue, contextualists are committed to a certain 'error theory'.
It is this historical data that is at issue in Friday's arguments.
This is a comforting argument; unfortunately, though, it assumes precisely what's at issue.
