To conclude, it is argued that the database plays an important productive and performative role in mapping and comparing diverse food sharing economies.
Prosecutors also argue that the database could be used to exonerate the wrongfully convicted by matching DNA in their cases to someone else.
Supporters of the system argue that the database would have provided the means to apprehend some of the Sept. 11 terrorists who were known to the F.B.I., but, they say, could not be located before the attack.
In fact, it can be argued that the database offered few opportunities for the optometrists to respond to the feedback they received.
The ruling, by Judge Alexander Williams Jr. of United States District Court in Maryland, sided with a manufacturer who sued to keep its name out of the database, arguing that the complaint against it was confusing and contradictory and therefore should not be published.
Sanders' lawsuit sought the "immediate restoration" of the campaign's access to the database, arguing that the campaign would lose roughly $600,000 a day in donations without it.
The California Medical Assn., the main trade group for doctors, has resisted any mandate on its members to consult the database, arguing that the Legislature shouldn't meddle in the practice of medicine.
Already, Representative Mike Pompeo, a newly elected Republican from Kansas, has succeeded in passing an amendment to an appropriations bill to strip financing for the consumer products database, arguing that the idea needed to be tweaked to protect manufacturers from bogus complaints and lawsuits.
We analyzed the comprehensiveness of our database by arguing that the novel variants discovered by adding a subset of genomes would saturate at some point if the database was near-comprehensive.
