Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

arguing for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"arguing for" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to express a person's position or stance in a debate or discussion. Example: He spent the whole evening arguing for stricter gun control laws.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Economists were arguing for a carbon tax.

News & Media

The Economist

No one's arguing for it.

News & Media

The Guardian

I'm arguing for reforming Europe.

Nevertheless, arguing for Hennis's innocence is difficult.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"We were arguing for more time.

News & Media

The New York Times

So am I arguing for protectionism?

News & Media

The New York Times

The Irish were arguing for the opposite.

News & Media

The Guardian

Effectively he is arguing for taxation by stealth.

We're arguing for what most of our history has had".

News & Media

The Economist

I can't believe anyone would be arguing for that".

Many legislators are arguing for returning to the Moon first.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "arguing for" when you want to present a reasoned case, not just express an opinion. It implies a logical justification for a particular stance.

Common error

Avoid using "arguing for" in extremely informal contexts where simpler terms like "supporting" or "rooting for" would be more appropriate. "Arguing for" suggests a more reasoned and structured presentation of ideas.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "arguing for" is to act as a verb phrase indicating the act of supporting or advocating a particular position or course of action. As Ludwig AI explains, it expresses a person's stance in a debate or discussion.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "arguing for" is a versatile phrase used to express support or advocacy for a particular viewpoint. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used, particularly in news, scientific and business contexts. When using "arguing for", ensure clarity and specificity in your statements. While alternatives such as "advocating for" or "supporting" exist, "arguing for" implies a reasoned and structured presentation, making it suitable for formal discussions and debates. Be mindful of the context to avoid using it in overly informal situations.

FAQs

How to use "arguing for" in a sentence?

You can use "arguing for" to show support for a specific idea or course of action. For example, "The economist was arguing for a carbon tax" or "They are arguing for stricter gun control laws".

What can I say instead of "arguing for"?

You can use alternatives like "advocating for", "supporting", or "making a case for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "arguing for" or "arguing about"?

"Arguing for" indicates support for something, while "arguing about" indicates a disagreement or dispute. For example, you might be "arguing for" a new policy, but "arguing about" its effectiveness.

What's the difference between "arguing for" and "arguing in favor of"?

"Arguing for" and "arguing in favor of" are very similar and often interchangeable. The latter is slightly more formal, but both convey the same meaning of advocating for a particular position.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: