The phrase "arguing a case that" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a legal argument or presenting a point of view in a debate or discussion.
Example: "The lawyer is arguing a case that highlights the importance of evidence in securing a conviction."
Alternatives: "presenting an argument that" or "making a case that".
Some will say: ah, suck it up; if you want to stick your neck out and argue a case that may polarise people, you're asking for it.
He is wasting more state time and resources to argue a case that will render only a temporary win.
Few could argue a case that these are not privileged constituents, yet I have discovered that to draw attention to any element of privilege within the Sanders's base prompts denial and, often, rage.
One courageous teenager at the school, Aidan DeStefano, is working with the ACLU to intervene in the case, rightfully arguing that a case that could impact transgender students should involve transgender students.
As chairman of the law committee of the Manhattan Democratic Committee, Mr. Feldman challenged the constitutionality of the 1961 statute that redrew Manhattan's four Congressional districts, arguing, in a case that reached the United States Supreme Court, that the boundaries created racial enclaves.
The University of Notre Dame is similarly arguing, in a case that the Supreme Court asked the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider, that a compromise backed by the Obama administration would violate the school's religious values.
Q: Back in 1972, you argued in a case that the actor Lee Marvin's girlfriend of six years deserved half of his $3.6 million in assets.
NEW YORK The About New York column on Wednesday, about the phenomenon of people appearing online under a fictive name to argue or finagle or bully, misidentified the court where prosecutors filed a brief arguing that such a case that resulted in felony convictions for a defendant should be upheld.
Other officials, including some still serving in the administration, argue that Mr. Powell presented a case that paid too little attention to information that might have undermined the worst-case conclusions the administration was highlighting.
Not in the sense that I thought they made a case that deserved arguing with directly.
