Sentence examples for argues in terms of from inspiring English sources

We should think about time, he argues, in terms of assets and debts, like money.

"The Invisible Line," by Daniel J. Sharfstein (Penguin; $27.95) This is an important reconsideration of the porousness of racial categories — which function, Sharfstein argues, "in terms of racism, not race; hierarchy as opposed to heredity; barriers instead of blood" — and also a powerful evocation of the peril and insecurity that blacks faced both before and after the Civil War.

Nonetheless, this is an important reconsideration of the porousness of racial categories — which function, Sharfstein argues, "in terms of racism, not race; hierarchy as opposed to heredity; barriers instead of blood" — and also a powerful evocation of the peril and insecurity that blacks faced both before and after the Civil War.

That poses a challenge to any who prefer to argue in terms of an agreed-upon set of facts and numbers, even accepting how limited and incomplete those numbers often are.

Unlike today, doctors then seem to have felt little need to brand their collective action as a defence of the service by proxy, arguing in terms of their living standards.

The materials design of the multiferroics and the strategy to enhance the DC and optical magnetoelectric effect are argued in terms of the toroidal moment, helical spin structure, and critical-state phase control.

Democrats are sensitive to charges of defeatism — Howard Dean was widely criticized when he said earlier this year that the war is lost — but the Democratic Party's more hawkish leaders (Connecticut's Senator Joseph Lieberman excepted) no longer argue in terms of victory or defeat.

The Social Democrats did not argue in terms of culture and identity, but they questioned the evidence against mother tongue instruction improving Danish skills.

One could, of course, argue in terms of the current economic performance of the two countries which leads to optimism in one case and serious doubts in the other.

But in their lobby meetings, they at least have to appear to argue in terms of the merits.

"In court that [notifying an HIV-positive patient's partner] can be argued in terms of breaching professional ethics because as you know ethically it is wrong to disclose your patient's result or diagnosis to third parties without that individual's consent.