argues how

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "argues how" is not correct and is generally not used in written English.
It is typically used incorrectly because "argues" should be followed by a direct object or a clause that specifies what is being argued, rather than "how." Example: "The author argues that climate change is a pressing issue."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

Each chapter takes a collection of key countries, summarizes their enduring features and national interests, and then argues how Washington should relate to them to ensure that no power emerges, in any region or globally, to unite others against the United States.

The New York Times - Books

Her earliest attempts at fiction-writing, one of which was rejected (without encouragement to soften the blow) by TS Eliot, were deemed by her "too personal"; she subsequently learned, her biography Peter J Conradi argues, how "to burn the confessional and subjective out of her writing".

The Guardian - Books

This paper is organised as follows: The "Expectations vs. deliverables" section argues how important expectations management is for economic policy advisors.

Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics

Haman argues how laws and policies governing the rangelands have afforded little consideration of the long-term sustainable use of resources, encouraging overgrazing practices and rangeland degradation.

Pastoralism

Common Cause, a Washington-based lobbying group that describes itself as "promoting open, honest and accountable government," argues "how neatly it fits with American tradition".

Forbes

Research literature argues how most airlines nowadays use some kind of rule-of-thumb when they are evaluating the impact of decisions on the passengers, while others just assign a monetary cost to each minute of delay and evaluate the solutions taking this value [4].

European Transport Research Review

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

It worked, they argue: how wrong the critics were.

The Economist

It shows, they argue, how flawed Europe's merger regime has become.

The Economist

He argued: "How can nature expressed in human form be indecent?

The Guardian

Derek Cattell Durham Katharine Viner's article was spot-on and well argued (How technology disrupted the truth, 12 July).

The Guardian - TV & Radio

But as Mr. Bogle and many low-cost advocates argue, how can you find market-beating managers in advance?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer using "argues that" when you want to introduce a statement that someone is trying to prove or support with evidence. For example: "The author argues that climate change policies require international collaboration."

Common error

Avoid using "argues how" when your intention is to explain a process or mechanism. Instead, use "explains how" or "demonstrates how" to clearly convey that you are providing a description rather than presenting an argument. For example, instead of "The paper argues how the new algorithm improves efficiency", write "The paper explains how the new algorithm improves efficiency".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "argues how" is used to introduce an explanation, but it's grammatically unconventional. Ludwig AI indicates that the correct structure would typically involve "argues that" followed by a clause presenting the argument. The intended grammatical function is to introduce an argumentative claim or explanation, similar to a conjunction.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Wiki

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While "argues how" appears frequently in varied sources, Ludwig AI indicates that it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. The intended meaning often revolves around explaining a perspective or viewpoint, similar to phrases like "argues that", "explains how", or "demonstrates how". The usage contexts, spanning from scientific papers to news articles, suggest that users are trying to convey structured arguments or provide explanations. It's advisable to use the grammatically correct "argues that" or similar alternatives for clarity and adherence to standard English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

argues that

Replaces "how" with "that" to introduce a clause specifying the argument directly.

contends that

Offers a more formal alternative to "argues", emphasizing the assertion of a belief or opinion.

asserts that

Similar to "contends that", but with a slightly stronger emphasis on the forcefulness of the claim.

explains how

Shifts focus from argumentation to explanation, presenting a process or mechanism.

claims that

A more neutral alternative to "argues", simply stating that someone is making a claim.

demonstrates how

Highlights the process of showing or proving something through evidence or reasoning.

shows how

Focuses on illustrating a process or relationship, often through examples or data.

posits that

Introduces a proposition or hypothesis for consideration, often in academic or scientific contexts.

details how

Provides a comprehensive description of a process or method.

suggests how

Presents a possible method or approach, often without strong assertion.

FAQs

Is it grammatically correct to use "argues how"?

No, the phrase "argues how" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. It's better to use "argues that" or another more appropriate phrase to introduce the argument being made.

What can I use instead of "argues how"?

You can use alternatives like "argues that", "explains how", or "demonstrates how" depending on the intended meaning.

When should I use "argues that" instead of "argues how"?

Use "argues that" when you want to introduce a specific claim or point that someone is trying to prove or support. For example: "The author "argues that" stricter regulations are needed" is more appropriate than "The author argues how stricter regulations are needed".

What is the difference between "argues that" and "explains how"?

"Argues that" introduces a claim or opinion that is being defended, while "explains how" introduces a description of a process or mechanism. For example: "The scientist "argues that" the new data supports their theory", versus "The scientist "explains how" the experiment was conducted".