The phrase "argues email" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express a point made in an email, but as it stands, it lacks clarity and context.
Example: "In her response, she argues that the email was misinterpreted."
Alternatives: "contends in the email" or "claims in the email".
One could argue email lists, groups, and community boards, such as Craigslist, also created places for writers to post content and connect with others.
Dr Leah Reich, a sociologist and Slack's user researcher, argues that email represents an older generation of workers and an outmoded way of communicating: "Email is hierarchical and compartmentalized, and great for political maneuvering".
In the US to date, there have been no legal rulings in this area, however Dr Sands argues that email is an excellent tool for defence against medical malpractice suits because, unlike a poorly documented phone call, email is permanent.
But David Temkin, AOL's senior vice president of mail and mobile, argues that email clients haven't kept up with the changes — with the last major innovation coming in 2004, when Gmail launched.
Blogger Sid Savara argues that email can distract you from what you actually want and need to work on.
The lack of an express ban on uncleared swaps... converts the clearing requirement into a mere suggestion," argues an email obtained by the Huffington Post that was sent last week by consumer advocacy group Americans for Financial Reform to a Senate Banking Committee staffer.
One could argue that Email is less relevant as we move forward, but Email is still valuable today.
If you're arguing via email, stop.
None were shy about forcefully expressing their opinions on the omissions and rankings: some were still arguing via email weeks later.
There's no shortage of pundits arguing that email is dead, or at least dying, soon to be replaced by Slack, WhatsApp, or some heretofore unknown communication channel.
