Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(28)
He argues (i) that there aren't any genuine ontological puzzles about music, (ii) that musical ontology depends on musical value judgments, and thus (iii) that musical ontology has no implications for musical aesthetics.
However, Chalmers argues (i) that his main anti-materialist conclusions do not depend essentially on the stability of phenomenal terms like 'pain'[1] and (ii) that his main anti-materialist conclusions survive if physical terms are unstable.[2] Instead of challenging its premises, one might object to the form of Chalmers' argument.
In contrast, Bork argues i) that none of the Amendments cited covered the case before the Court, ii) that the Supreme Court never articulated or clarified what the right to privacy was or how far it extended, and he charges iii) that the privacy right merely protected what a majority of justices personally wanted it to cover.
The Transamerica star argues: "I think it is completely different.
As Burnell argues: "I love the saying, 'derby for all'.
As Mr Warburton himself argues, "I hope the voters will put me before the party".
Similar(32)
We argued, I remember.
I argued: I think he's starting to recognize streets.
The thug didn't argue: I was Alexei's passenger.
The government argued I wanted to tarnish its reputation.
If you're still arguing, I must have paid.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com