The phrase "argued warning" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be an attempt to combine two concepts, but it lacks clarity and proper usage.
Example: "The scientist issued an argued warning about the potential dangers of climate change, emphasizing the need for immediate action."
Alternatives: "cautioned alert" or "advised notice".
Growth takes care of deficits, he argued, warning his party against being "green-eyeshade" types obsessed with austerity.Explaining why he differs from his former mentor on this, Mr Ryan points out that Kemp worked in an age when far smaller sums went on pensions, health care for the old and other social transfers, and deficits were less of a worry.
Manufacturing in Britain had collapsed over recent years due to the impact of high energy prices, he argued, warning that the huge Ineos petrochemical plant at Runcorn in Cheshire, which has 1,600 workers, would be closed eventually unless something was done to cut power bills.
She argued that warning labels served as a guide for parents to make their own decisions about whether material was appropriate.
No 10 sources argue that warning about Miliband is only one part of what they describe as a broad campaign that is very clear-eyed about the positive things the prime minister is offering.
Now, some people might argue for warning the public and letting consumers choose for themselves how much risk to take, as they do every time they step into a car or go for a swim; others might go a bit further, and require warning labels on ribs of beef.
His guests argued otherwise, warning that opposing the proclamation would be a "fatal error".
A drastic loss of nuclear power would bring dire economic consequences, he has repeatedly argued, echoing warnings from Japan's business lobby.
He argued that warnings from Mr Darling to deliver devolution promises showed that "a lot of games are being played at Westminster".
That the snow guns initially produced yellow snow prompted several citizens to file complaints with the state's environmental quality department, arguing that signs warning people not to ingest the snow were too small and that children were observed rolling around in it, among other things.
Although the label warned that gangrene could occur if the drug came into contact with arterial blood, Levine argued that the warning did not go far enough.
If what the Soviets had detonated in 1953 were considered an H-bomb, then those in the United States who had argued against Oppenheimer, warning of an ascendant Russia, would be vindicated.
