The phrase "argued that the implementation" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing a position or claim made by someone regarding the execution or application of a particular plan or policy.
Example: "The researchers argued that the implementation of the new policy would lead to significant improvements in efficiency."
Alternatives: "contended that the execution" or "asserted that the application".
Advocates have repeatedly argued that the implementation of New York's new Medicaid managed long-term care program is being rushed and have called for a delay.
The authority argued that the implementation of some of the union's proposals could decrease safety if platforms and trains became overcrowded.
It is argued that the implementation of ERP in this specific context was more than an adaptation of a standardized information system relative to organizational requirements, and that the organizational adaptations were more than a re-engineering of business processes relative to ERP.
It is argued that the implementation of standards combined with an external survey is no guarantee for continuous improvement.
19 Furthermore, it has been argued that the implementation of such systems must be viewed as a process involving organisational change.
On the other hand, one respondent (diabetes care) argued that the implementation of the n-EPR would improve the technical quality of electronic information systems, because connection to the national infrastructure is only allowed when certain quality requirements have been fulfilled (see additional file 1).
Microsoft argued that implementation of the European Commission court's March 2004 ruling that it had abused its "dominant" position in the software industry would create "irreparable harm".
Social network theory argues that the implementation of innovative technology, such as disaster prevention technology, to a great extent lies in understanding social networks and their role in information processing activities (Granovetter 1983; Rogers 1983).
We argue that the implementation of the Light Rail was and is entangled with discourses that portray it as a neutral, modern and efficient means of transportation for Jerusalem as a "metropolis", legitimizing the connection between the West of the city and the East, creating facts on the ground against the background of a controversial territorial and political situation.
In this manuscript, drawing on the literature and recent empirical observations in seven tropical national parks, I argue that the implementation of monitoring must go beyond the rational model of transfer from science to policy and focus on the processes of co-construction between knowledge and action.
