The phrase "argued that science" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing a claim or position taken by someone regarding scientific matters or findings.
Example: "The researcher argued that science plays a crucial role in understanding climate change."
Alternatives: "contended that science" or "asserted that science".
Peter Singer has argued that science proves that unique human lives do not begin at conception.
It's often argued that science has killed God, and that scientific knowledge reduces the mystery of the universe.
No sensible person or politician has ever argued that science is not useful, but many take its contribution for granted.
Mr. Miller and others in women's groups argued that science was on their side, citing the support of major medical groups.
The difference is that philosophy is simply not like science; it is much more intricately wrapped up in cultural legacies (some have argued that science is just another cultural practice too, but I'm not prepared to say that either).
The document argued that science and technology was geared too much towards the interests of wealthier nations and called for research agendas to focus more on the needs of developing countries.
They'd argue that science is a system of metaphors, complete with a style and an ideology, rather than the royal road to the truth.
Arguing that "science has demonstrated that the intermarriage of diverse races is indispensable to a progressive humanity," it triumphantly unveiled a new vocabulary to accompany America's noble, interracial future.
Do not assume that every attack on Creationism is an attack on religion itself, anymore so than you would argue that science as a whole is invalid.
The book argued that science-dominated modern society was ugly, repressive and soulless; that youthful dissent was coherent enough to be termed a culture; and that this anti-rationalist "counterculture" — a term Dr. Roszak popularized and may have invented — might offer the foundation of a new visionary civilization.
Harris argued that "science-backed alternatives" exist to the FDA's blanket ban on sexually active gay and bisexual men.
