(But then, aren't fumbles often caused by the player you don't see?) Another said, "Dude, you're arguing scenarios that have less than a 1% chance of happening".
It is argued that scenarios used for engineering purposes are impoverished in comparison with the sort of properties enjoyed by good stories and that the metaphor of scenarios as stories is one of limited utility.
It is often argued that scenarios have limited ecological validity (the extent to which an aspect of the real world is represented, in this case the real world of clinical practice) [ 24].
The third section, however, argues that scenario methodology is inadequate for informing decision making on the contemporary Middle Eastern upheavals.
In this article, we argue that scenario analysis could play an important role in the design of strategy maps, as it is an effective method to look at the future.
We argue that scenario (i) is most plausible, and therefore propose that the present-day extreme form of self-fertilization seen in this species is likely to have originated relatively recently in evolutionary time, perhaps facilitated or exacerbated by the loss of pheromone attraction between the sexes [ 18].
However, it may be argued that this scenario points to an unfavourable disease biology in patients who would not benefit from extensive surgery anyway, but would better be treated with alternative systemic treatment.
It could be argued that this scenario is more parsimonious since only one inter-domain HGT event would be required, if a subsequent transfer from wPip (or a related strain) to wMel is assumed.
PassLogix founders Arnold and Boroditsky argue these scenarios still allow anyone sitting at your computer to assume your identity.
In this way, Gerrig argues, fictional scenarios can be effectively uncertain for viewers even if they know the outcome.
