Sentence examples for argued in section from inspiring English sources
As argued in section 4.3, punishment, not suffering, should be thought of as the proper retributive desert object, and thus the instrumentalist conception should be rejected.
As was argued in section 3.2, even if they are weak, the presence of positive desert makes a difference to the justification of punishment.
However, as argued in Section 5.2 of the companion paper, the alleged unobserved scale factor may be the consequence of a failure to identify preferences correctly.
We also argued in Section 3 that young mothers might have to quit the labor force if they experience a severe illness themselves.
As argued in Section 3, the coefficients in the Bartolucci wage equation can be interpreted as productivity-adjusted measures of discrimination of certain groups of employees.
As we have argued in Section 4, for instance, the hunt for time machines in general relativity theory should be interpreted as a core issue in studying the fortunes of Penrose's cosmic censorship conjecture.
As is have argued in sections III and IV, bottlenecks such as in the case seen for island (or lake) colonisation will contribute very significantly to promoting speciation because the reduction in the effective population size will result in a decrease in mutation loads, hence lifting the safeguard against further events of speciation.
As we will argue in Section 4.2, the use of semantic relations serves a double purpose: better semantic description and increased robustness to transcription errors.
Instead, LETX relies on LQI-based LDR estimation, which can be done by using a single LQI value (as we argue in Section 6.3).
It is unlikely that this procedure would result in an overall arbitrage-free valuation of the counterparty risky contract in a nonlinear framework since, as we argue in Section 6, the additivity of ex-dividend prices obtained by solving nonlinear BSDEs fails to hold, in general.
Plantinga himself argued in [1979] (Section III) that it does, although he later recanted in [1983], where he points out the "flocculent thinking" (p. 12) of his earlier argument.
