The phrase "argued harshly" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where someone is expressing their disagreement or criticism in a severe or severe manner.
Example: "During the debate, she argued harshly against the proposed policy, highlighting its flaws and potential consequences."
Alternatives: "contended vehemently" or "debated fiercely".
Wild innovation in prostate massagers also points to a willingness to abandon the old male toy quest to replicate sex a fools errand sex writer Lux Alptraum argues harshly limits their possible forms and sensations.
A8 Philanthropy With Strings Donors are increasingly keeping close tabs on the organizations and institutions they support and are not afraid to argue publicly and harshly with them over how their gifts are spent.
She argued that these relationships are too harshly criticized.
Film historian Andrew DeVos has argued that the animal deaths have been harshly condemned because of the film's classification as exploitation, whereas animal mutilations in films perceived by critics to be classics or art films are often ignored.
It could be argued, with some justification, that the Sharks were never punished harshly enough for their supplements program during the 2011 season.
In a statement published by the party's co-chairs, Selahattin Demirtaş and Figen Yüksekdağ, the party harshly criticised the Justice and Development party (AKP) government and argued that the attack aimed to "break international solidarity for Kobani".
Some will argue Crosby has been harshly treated; that he and HBOS were merely creatures of the political, banking and regulatory climate of the time; that the removal of knighthoods has become arbitrary and the honours system itself is damaged that way.
Amazingly, the Justice Department argued successfully that the entire subject of "extraordinary rendition" — dispatching torture suspects to other countries to be interrogated harshly — was so sensitive that it had to be hidden from the American public, to the point of barring its victims from seeking redress in court.
Both suits, filed in Manhattan federal court, argued that holding people overnight after such arrests violated their civil and constitutional rights because it treated demonstrators more harshly than others arrested for the same offenses.
Strangely perhaps, it is the dovish element in the United States — including liberal Jews who are harshly critical of the current Israeli administration's policies— that has expressed opposition to the Shalit deal and argued that it reveals a dangerous weakness on the part of Israel.
