The phrase "argued carefully" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a discussion or debate where the points were presented with thoughtfulness and consideration.
Example: "During the meeting, she argued carefully, ensuring that all perspectives were taken into account before reaching a conclusion."
Alternatives: "debated thoughtfully" or "discussed meticulously".
We might expect Socrates and Glaucon to argue carefully by elimination, showing the just life to be better than every sort of unjust life.
Although concerned with the rites of cooking and not the rights of man, Pinkard's lucidly argued and carefully researched account is, in this respect, more than just a story about food.
Several Sudanese elders in the camp have suggested that the State Department's money would be better spent encouraging peace in Sudan, echoing the philosophy of several human rights organizations that have argued that carefully orchestrated, pre-emptive intervention could stem the tide of displacement worldwide.
Because the allocation of ecosystem services directly affects many people and raises normative questions about social equity, it is argued that carefully designed discursive methods will help ensure the achievement of social equity goals.
Other scholars argue that carefully targeted economic sanctions can influence the behaviour of other states.
While the Bush administration mostly favored voluntary compliance by industry, senior Obama administration officials argue that carefully crafted regulation can be a positive force.
"If you care about the distribution effects of these policies, and being fairer to the elderly or other people, that seems to argue for carefully designed fiscal stimulus," said Robert J. Shiller, an economics professor at Yale. "With fiscal stimulus you have more control over who gets taxed at what rate and so on.
We conclude by arguing for carefully designed social science research around the implementation and impact of community sensitisation activities.
From this the author goes on to argue that carefully designed prospective placebo-controlled and randomised trials are required to provide definite answers as to the sense and non-sense of vitamin D supplementation in individuals affected by or at risk of type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
His letter was carefully argued.
